Issues : Errors in FE
|
b. 10-12
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 22, Prelude in G minor
..
The missing slur in b. 10-11 and the slur in b. 12 in FE (→EE1) must be oversights of the engraver. The earlier starting point of the slur in b. 10 in GE is probably a result of the notation of FC, in which the beginning of that slur may suggest such an interpretation (Fontana probably took the bottom arm of the accent/diminuendo in A for the beginning of the slur). In EE2 the slurs were added probably after GE (in b. 10 inaccurately). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Inaccuracies in GE |
|||||||||
|
b. 17-19
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 22, Prelude in G minor
..
The omitted staccato dots over the 1st octave in b. 17 and 19 (as well as 25 and 27) are mistakes of Fontana and the engraver of FE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Errors of FC |
|||||||||
|
b. 25-27
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 22, Prelude in G minor
..
These bars are a repetition of b. 17-19; likewise, the staccato dots written in A were not reproduced in any of the remaining sources. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Errors of FC |
|||||||||
|
b. 33-34
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 22, Prelude in G minor
..
The omitted pedalling markings in these bars resulted from the carelessness of the engravers of FE and EE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Errors in EE |
|||||||||
|
b. 35-37
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 22, Prelude in G minor
..
The omission of three slurs in these bars is most probably a mistake of FE, while the change of the range of the slurs in b. 36-37 is probably a revision unifying them with the authentic slur in b. 35-36. However, it does not result from the notation of the manuscripts, in spite of their minor inaccuracies. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , GE revisions |
